| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 19:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:
Rumors say something about invention buff, which is welcome by all means.
I see you know exactly what your talking about, because those "Rumors" have actually been released by CCP already and got discuessed in this section several times new decryptors
btw. I bet my whole 1,5 bil on my wallet that most of the 179 BPO-¦s wont actually be sold... Eve needs end-game goals like T2 BPO`s. you could easily compare them with titans for indy guys. I guess titans are unfair too because you can`t open a bridge with your rifter but he can, gotcha.
|

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 11:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
Azrael Dinn wrote: funny thing is that if you read the EULA and other game relates rules... no they do not need to compensate the T2 BPO owners anything. .
It-¦s obviously not a national-law they would be breaking, BUT taking away hard worked Game items away is just something CCP has never done before and will never do. For the simple reason that nobody would trust CCP enough anymore to spend hours and hours to grind money.
So saying "they-¦d have to reimburse" is not stupid or wrong at all.
Azrael Dinn wrote: it would be a good time to get rid of those old relics anyways
CCP and the majority of the Player-base seem not to share your opinion, so it might be rather the time to stop whining after 7 years?
|

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 12:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Azrael Dinn wrote: I didn't say it's wrong to say something like that I just stated that they can do what they want
yep you did, and your doing it again. They dont have to by law, but they do have to if they don-¦t wana lose a fecal- ton of subscirptions for the mentioned reasons
Azrael Dinn wrote:if they want and they don't need to listen to whiny nerds if they do something what they want to do. exactly, but with "whiny nerds" i-¦m guessing you don-¦t mean the obvious jelly ppl "complaining" about the current situation but those who try to explain to you why their removal will never happen anyway? So it was a T2 BPO owner who brought this whiny topic up I guess.
Azrael Dinn wrote: Also when you talk about majority of the player base you mean the people commenting over and over this in the forums. Your lucky if it's even a fraction form the playerbase. Majority of the playerbase don't even care about this subject.
exactly! but you seem to care about it a lot, so all those people who don`t care about it, obviously don-¦t share your opinion. So what did I say wrong?
Azrael Dinn wrote: But as it seems your so butthurt about it, it also means you got one or two of those originals in your hangars.
going down to that level I could easily say your the butthurt one because you cant afford or dont have one... see what I did? But actually NO I dont have a T2 BPO or ever owned one, I just don-¦t like ppl wich are ignoring all facts to hide their enviousness behind those lame arguments.
|

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 14:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
AlphaOperative Altren wrote:
All changes have an impact on someone. The scanning changes are going to effect people who do a lot of that stuff as the competition will be higher, ice roid changes. I've recently lost the ability to fly cyclones effectively as my missile skills aren't up to mustard. Like I said every change eve makes causes someone a problem, what makes t2 bpos any different.
changing something is something completly different than just taking it away from your hangar like you guys ask for T2 BPO-¦s. Also the tiny difference of the value of a T2 BPO and a Cyclone does also make a difference.
But most importantly, Why should they remove those prints, when it's proven that they don't rly hurt anyone and nobody has a unfair advantage through them? just to stop ppl bitching who doesnt understand that?
|

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
55
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 11:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Amathius M wrote:
The thing is its a KNOWN fact that these BPOs were handed out like candy to friends etc.
the good thing on facts is that they are easily to proof. Do you have any evidences for any remaining T2 BPO that got brought into the illegaly?
and no, he has not reached brewlars level of aggresive ignorance (yet) |

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
55
|
Posted - 2013.06.26 20:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Milan Nantucket wrote:CCP will compensate the removal... not sure why you think they wouldn't/
not sure why you think that there will ever be a removal |

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
55
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 07:26:00 -
[7] - Quote
Styth spiting wrote:
but the ability for T2 BPO manufacturers to sell items at a price that is unprofitable though invention as well as decreasing the gap in the profitability of T2 BPO's over invention has been decreased enough for people who own these blueprints to want and try to sell them off before their decreased value becomes known.
max ME is still -1, no change there. If there was no profit to make before the patch, there won't profit for the Inventor today either( in most cases at least).
The biggest buff for invention wasn`t actually the decryptor change itself, but the new hacking site that is actually fun to run now.
|

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
55
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 19:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote: Hello, I want to inform everyone who is on my Block-List cause that matters to this topic
cool story AND valuable post. still blocked now, tho |

Sabre Rolf
Republic University Minmatar Republic
55
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 07:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:
If it costs less to make one run of a -1 BPC, that's a buff.
If it cost less to make any given ME of BPC, that's a buff for items where that's the most profitable decryptor to use.
~context~
I didn`t say anything else. I was just pointing out that the hard limit where a Inventor can make profit didn`t change much (only by the decreased decryptor price itself maybe)
|
| |
|